Tag: forest

  • The Leading Role of Brazilian Forests in the Global Climate Agenda – 2nd Edition

    The Leading Role of Brazilian Forests in the Global Climate Agenda – 2nd Edition


    Download here

    Brazilian agribusiness, which is already responsible for conserving vast areas through Legal Reserves, could become one of the main drivers of forest expansion in the country over the coming decades. This is one of the key conclusions of the second edition of the study Brazilian Forests at the Center of the Global Climate Agenda, which provides a comprehensive overview of forest conservation, restoration, and planted forests in Brazil, along with recommendations on financing and public policies. The document, which will be presented this year at all three United Nations Conferences of the Parties (COPs) — Climate, Biodiversity, and Desertification — argues that agricultural production, conservation, and forest expansion are not competing agendas, but complementary ones.

    According to the study, a significant portion of Brazil’s environmental conservation already takes place within rural properties through Legal Reserves and Permanent Preservation Areas (APPs). In addition, there is a substantial amount of privately owned land with limited suitability for agriculture or livestock production that could be allocated to forest restoration. At the same time, demand for planted forests to supply bioenergy production continues to grow.

    The second edition of the publication was developed by a coalition of institutions including Instituto Arapyaú, Instituto Itaúsa, Agroicone, the Brazilian Tree Industry (Ibá), the Brazil Climate, Forests and Agriculture Coalition, the Climate and Society Institute (iCS), Imazon, Amazônia 2030, CEBDS, and Uma Concertação pela Amazônia. One of its objectives is to influence the UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) to recognize forests as central to carbon removal and storage efforts.

    The new edition has received formal support from the COP30 Presidency. The material also served as an input for the organizations’ technical contributions to the Roadmap to Halt and Reverse Deforestation and Forest Degradation by 2030, proposed by the Brazilian COP30 Presidency.

    The first edition of the report, launched during the conference in Belém, showed that Brazil could reverse the deforestation curve and expand its forests by 2035, increasing forest cover from 517 million to 525 million hectares within ten years. This gain of 8 million hectares — equivalent to twice the size of Switzerland — would directly increase carbon stocks and strengthen the country’s strategic role in global climate stability.

    By offering a broad perspective on Brazil’s forest landscapes, the publication aims to identify challenges and outline pathways for reversing the historical loss of native vegetation and expanding forest cover once again. The analysis is structured around three pillars — conservation, forest restoration, and silviculture — and applies the internationally recognized concept of a “forest continuum,” which captures different forms of forest use and management across landscapes. Under this framework, preserved forests, sustainable forest management, restoration systems, and planted forests with native and exotic species coexist as part of a broader landscape strategy. According to the study, all these approaches can generate environmental and economic benefits, whether through biodiversity and water resource conservation, carbon sequestration, or supplying productive sectors.

    In this edition, the authors expanded the scope of the analysis to include all of Brazil’s terrestrial biomes. In addition to the Amazon and Atlantic Forest, the study covers the Cerrado, Caatinga, Pantanal, Pampa, and Coastal Zone, highlighting the importance of these ecosystems for carbon removal, soil protection, water cycle regulation, and biodiversity conservation.

    The report also emphasizes the strategic role of Indigenous Peoples and traditional communities in conserving Brazil’s forests. According to Imazon data, Indigenous Lands accounted for only 3% of all Amazon deforestation between 2012 and 2024, the lowest rate among all monitored territorial categories. The authors argue that strengthening territorial governance and expanding recognition of these populations as forest stewards will be essential for advancing conservation, restoration, and sustainable production.

    Agribusiness and the Forest Transition

    The connection between agribusiness and the forest transition operates through multiple pathways. A significant share of Brazil’s environmental conservation already occurs within private rural properties through Legal Reserves and Permanent Preservation Areas established under the Forest Code. The report reinforces that Brazil has already demonstrated its ability to reduce deforestation without harming agricultural production. Between 2004 and 2012, Amazon deforestation fell by 80%, while agricultural output in the region nearly doubled. During the same period, more than 55 million hectares were protected through conservation units.

    Forests are also essential for maintaining the climatic conditions that sustain Brazilian agriculture, particularly through the so-called “flying rivers” — atmospheric moisture flows that transport rainfall from the Amazon to the country’s Center-South region. The publication cites an international study published in 2026 in Communications Earth & Environment (Nature Portfolio), according to which the Brazilian Legal Amazon generates rainfall worth approximately US$20 billion per year for agriculture.

    Another major opportunity lies in forest restoration. According to the report, there is a substantial amount of privately owned land with limited suitability for agriculture or livestock production — such as highly degraded or steeply sloped areas — that could be dedicated to forest recovery. In addition to generating climate and biodiversity benefits, restoration helps landowners comply with environmental obligations under the Forest Code while creating opportunities for carbon credit generation and new income streams. By 2050, according to projections by the World Resources Institute (WRI), restoration could generate US$141 billion in Brazil through carbon markets, food production, biomaterials, and bioenergy.

    A preliminary assessment conducted by Agroicone in partnership with Floraz — a business-led initiative created to strengthen the forest restoration sector in Brazil — identified millions of hectares with restoration potential on agribusiness-linked lands, particularly degraded pastures. The study combined public and private geospatial datasets to identify areas suitable for restoration with native species, considering criteria such as low agricultural suitability, absence of recent deforestation, property size, and proximity to timber industry hubs. Under a conservative scenario, approximately 2.6 million hectares suitable for restoration were identified across roughly 8,000 rural properties.

    The expansion of corn ethanol production in Brazil has also increased, in some regions, the demand for forest biomass — especially eucalyptus and pine — used to generate thermal energy in processing plants, strengthening the connection between silviculture, bioenergy, and decarbonization strategies. During the 2024/2025 harvest season, corn ethanol accounted for 22% of total ethanol production in Brazil, reaching 8.2 million cubic meters. The Mato Grosso Institute of Agricultural Economics (Imea) projects this figure could reach 22.55 million cubic meters by 2034/2035.

    Adaptation: Forests Beyond Carbon

    The global forest agenda is beginning to shift its focus. While recent years have centered on carbon sequestration and the generation of tradable carbon credits, the physical impacts of climate change are increasingly placing adaptation at the center of economic discussions.

    The authors highlight that prolonged droughts, forest fires, extreme weather events, and water crises are already directly affecting productive sectors, infrastructure, and public finances. As a result, forests are increasingly viewed as a form of “natural infrastructure” capable of reducing climate risks, regulating rainfall patterns, protecting soils, and providing stability for agricultural, energy, and logistics systems.

    According to the report, the economic value of forests extends far beyond carbon and is increasingly linked to their capacity to ensure resilience and economic continuity in a world facing growing climate instability.

    However, the authors warn that financing for the forest agenda remains far below global needs. Despite growing recognition of forests’ strategic importance for climate stability, water security, and biodiversity, private capital continues to concentrate in markets perceived as less risky, leaving forest projects chronically underfunded. The publication argues that increasing financial flows alone will not be sufficient without structural changes in how the forest agenda is financed.

    The report advocates for blended finance models that combine public and private resources, as well as de-risking mechanisms, financial guarantees, and project-finance-inspired structures to make forest investments more attractive. A particularly important trend is the growing attention given to funds directed toward Indigenous Peoples and local communities, which are increasingly recognized as essential actors in achieving long-term environmental outcomes.

    The report concludes that the future of forest finance will depend on the intelligent combination of these instruments, rather than reliance on any single solution.

    Read the full paper here.

  • When the Rivers Run Dry: How Amazon Deforestation Threatens the Brazilian Economy

    When the Rivers Run Dry: How Amazon Deforestation Threatens the Brazilian Economy


    Download here

    The Amazon Rainforest is not only an environmental treasure but also an invaluable economic asset for Brazil. A new report by the Climate Policy Initiative (CPI/PUC-Rio) and the Amazônia 2030 project shows how deforestation in the Amazon impacts the so-called flying rivers — moisture currents formed by the forest’s evapotranspiration — compromising water supply and climate stability in several regions of the country.

    According to the study, the loss of forest cover already generates billions of reais in annual economic damage, especially to the energy sector. Hydropower plants such as Itaipu and Belo Monte alone have lost the potential to generate 3,700 GWh per year — equivalent to the total electricity consumption of the entire state of Rondônia — representing more than R$ 1 billion in annual losses.

    Impacts across multiple sectors

    The report reveals that the effects of deforestation also threaten other key sectors beyond energy:

    • Water supply: critical systems like Cantareira (SP) lie along the path of the flying rivers and could face reduced water availability, especially during drought periods.

    • Agriculture: rain-dependent crops such as soy, corn, and sugarcane face increasing risks; drought-related losses reached R$ 186 billion between 2013 and 2022.

    • Wildfires: reduced rainfall weakens vegetation resilience, increasing fire risks — more than 30 million hectares were affected in 2024.

    • Waterways: record droughts have disrupted grain transportation, potentially undermining Brazil’s competitiveness in global trade.

    Keeping the forest standing as a national strategy

    The researchers warn that by 2050, up to 47% of the Amazon may experience disturbances that would irreversibly compromise the provision of ecosystem services.

    “Protecting the Amazon is not just an environmental agenda — it is a strategic imperative for Brazil’s energy, water, and food security,”
    say authors Gustavo Pinto and João Pedro Arbache, from CPI/PUC-Rio.

    The study underscores that public policies to curb deforestation — such as PPCDAm, which reduced the forest destruction rate fivefold between 2004 and 2014 — are essential to keeping the country on a sustainable growth trajectory.

    Read the full paper here.

  • The Tropical Forests Mechanism

    The Tropical Forests Mechanism


    Download here

    Amazon 2030, with the support of BVRio and Igarapé Institute, released today a concept note on a Tropical Forests Mechanism (TFM) aimed at supporting nature finance at scale to guarantee the maintenance and enhancement of tropical forests worldwide. The mechanism is expected to complement the Brazilian government’s Tropical Forests Forever Fund (TFFF), announced at COP28, to secure funding to protect rainforests in the Amazon region, Congo Basin, and Southeast Asia.

    These three basins hold most of the world’s 1.2 billion hectares of tropical forests, and it is estimated that annual payments of USD 30 per hectare would provide enough incentives for their protection. The oil and gas sector, producing approximately 30 billion barrels a year, could provide most of the funding needed with a USD 1 per barrel contribution.

    Published ahead of the G20 Finance Ministers’ Meeting, the concept note proposes rules and procedures for distributing annual payments among tropical countries and to guide the application of resources within participating countries to maximise the impact in conservation of tropical forests.

    The TFM focuses on ‘hectares of forests’ rather than ‘tonnes of carbon’ as its primary metric, supporting the provision of environmental services such as carbon storage, biodiversity conservation, climate regulation, water retention, and benefits to forest stewards and inhabitants.  Unlike traditional carbon markets, the approach avoids challenges related to additionality, leakage, and permanence, allowing for an effective conservation effort.

    Key Features of the TFM:

    • Global financial support: Encourages resource-intensive sectors to contribute, aiming for a minimum of USD 1 per barrel of oil produced, potentially generating up to USD 30 billion annually.
    • Annual payments for forest conservation: The TFM proposes to allocate USD 30 per hectare of forest to tropical countries, promoting forest maintenance and enhancement.
    • Penalties for deforestation: The TFM also supports imposing a USD 3,000 penalty for each hectare of deforestation, incentivizing countries are incentivised to reduce forest loss, in the same rationale employed by Brazil’s proposed TFFF.
    • Eligibility Criteria: Ensures countries must meet strict deforestation reduction targets and support local communities and forest stewards.
    • Fast implementation: by not having complex baselines and financial instruments, it allows countries to achieve qualification in the short term, enabling rapid implementation of the mechanism and thus accelerating the achievement of the global goal of ending deforestation.

    The TFM is expected to complement and support the Brazilian government’s TFFF, garnering a conceptual framework from the civil society organisations that support the mechanism. The TFFF underscores Brazil’s commitment to environmental protection, setting a powerful example for other countries that aligns with the growing interest in nature-based solutions for climate change following a significant decrease in Amazon deforestation since early last year.

     

    In this sense, the TFM can be supported by a Global Pledge for Tropical Forests, through which companies would actively contribute to conserving the world’s tropical rainforests, fostering a global alliance for sustainability and environmental stewardship.

    Read the full paper here.

  • Amazônia 2030: Bases For Sustainable Development

    Amazônia 2030: Bases For Sustainable Development


    Download here

    The Amazon 2030 project aims to propose solutions for the economic, social, and environmental development of the Brazilian Amazon. In the first phase (2020-2022), the project – led by Brazilian researchers – engaged over 80 researchers from various regional, national, and international institutions. They published 60 technical reports on topics related to social policies (health, education, public safety, demography), the Amazonian economy (income and employment, public finance, bioeconomy, infrastructure, livestock, and others), environmental conservation (forest restoration, carbon market, anti-deforestation policies, etc.), as well as cross-cutting themes such as land tenure and cities.

    The book “Amazon 2030” (Volume 1) is a synthesis of the studies published in the first phase of the project. It is structured into three chapters:

    1. The Amazon Paradox;
    2. The Five Amazons: Foundations for the Sustainable Development of the Brazilian Amazon;
    3. Zero Deforestation and Land Use Planning: Pillars for the Sustainable Development of the Brazilian Amazon.

    The first chapter addresses the so-called Amazon paradox, in which three serious problems are recast as opportunities for the region.

    Firstly, over the last decades, the Amazon has experienced extensive deforestation, amounting to around 84 million hectares. This has resulted in the creation of vast degraded areas, often abandoned or occupied by low-productivity agriculture or cattle ranching. If productivity were improved, these deforested areas could accommodate all agricultural expansion in the region, creating a surplus of approximately 35 million hectares. This surplus could be utilized for forest restoration involving the planting of native trees for carbon capture or directed towards other land uses.

    Secondly, despite facing excessive deforestation, the Brazilian Amazon retains a vast remaining forest cover that is gaining increasing strategic value and importance due to its environmental services, potential for the bioeconomy, and superlative biodiversity.

    Thirdly, the Amazon has over 8 million working-age adults who are not in the workforce. This serious social crisis can represent an opportunity, heightened by the fact that the region is still benefiting from a demographic bonus. That is, the number of economically active adults is larger than the number of children and the elderly.

    The second chapter discusses the heterogeneity that exists within the Brazilian Amazon. Covering 5 million km2, which is equivalent to 59% of Brazil, the region displays distinct patterns of human occupation and land use. Recognizing the different “Amazons” is a precondition for any feasible sustainable development plan for the region. In this chapter, the Brazilian Amazon is divided into five major zones: “The Forested Brazilian Amazon”, “The Brazilian Amazon with Forest Under Pressure”, “The Deforested Brazilian Amazon”, “The Non-Forested Brazilian Amazon” (the vast majority of this area is covered by savanna-type vegetation and natural grasslands), and “The Urban Brazilian Amazon” (where about two-thirds of the population resides). Policy suggestions vary depending on the zone. For example, intensifying agriculture and forest restoration are critical for the development of the Deforested Brazilian Amazon. In contrast, environmental enforcement carries greater weight in the Brazilian Amazon with Forest Under Pressure, where most deforestation has occurred. The bioeconomy should be encouraged throughout the region, but it is key in the Forested Amazon. The carbon market is fundamental in all zones, but the REDD+ mechanism (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) is even more critical in the Brazilian Amazon with Forest Under Pressure.

    Ending deforestation is crucial for both the environment and climate, as well as for the economic and social development of the Brazilian Amazon. Continued deforestation keeps Amazonian society trapped in a vicious cycle of environmental destruction with low land productivity, high poverty rates, and slow social progress. Moreover, it has contributed in recent years to an explosion of environmental crimes and increased violence in the region.

    In summary, deforestation deteriorates the economic environment and prevents good investments in the region. Land use planning is also imperative, as approximately 29% of the Brazilian Amazon territory remains with undefined land tenure, a significant portion of which consists of public forests not allocated.

    The bases for allocating these lands are already present in current Brazilian legislation. Therefore, it is crucial that land use planning policy in the Brazilian Amazon aligns the procedures for allocating public lands according to the order of priorities identified in the Constitution and national legislation.

    Increasing regional productivity, attracting good investors and entrepreneurs to the region, harnessing opportunities related to the bioeconomy and forest restoration, and ensuring the provision and remuneration of ecosystem services provided by the forest are all impossible without zero deforestation and land use planning.

    Read the full paper here.

  • The 5 Amazons

    The 5 Amazons


    Download here

    The Brazilian Amazon covers about 5 million square kilometers (59% of Brazil), with significant socioeconomic and natural differences within its territory. Although complex and heterogeneous, the Brazilian Amazon can be divided into five major zones based on the remaining vegetation cover. In turn, each of these zones is associated with specific public policies for it to thrive.

    We adopted the methodology originally developed by Imazon in 2007 for defining such zones, in which each of the 772 municipalities in the Brazilian Amazon was classified based on vegetation cover and deforestation. This analysis produced four major zones: zone 1, “The Forested Brazilian Amazon”, zone 2 ,“The Brazilian Amazon with Forest Under Pressure”, zone 3, “The Deforested Brazilian Amazon” (that is, originally forested, but that have lost a large part of its forest), and zone 4, “The Non-Forested Brazilian Amazon” (the vast majority of this area is covered by savanna-type vegetation and natural grasslands). We recently updated this analysis to incorporate new deforestation data available through the National Institute for Space Research’s (INPE) Prodes Project and to define a fifth major zone: zone 5, “The Urban Brazilian Amazon”.

    The zone 4, “The Non-Forested Brazilian Amazon” is comprised of municipalities whose original vegetation cover was mostly savannas. The other four zones correspond to municipalities that originally had more than 50% of their territory covered by forests. Considering these four zones, zone 3, “The Deforested Brazilian Amazon”, corresponds to municipalities that have lost more than 70% of their original forest, excluding Protected Areas (Conservation Units and/or Indigenous Lands). In contrast, zone 1 “The Forested Brazilian Amazon”, is comprised of municipalities that lost less than 5% of their original forest cover. The municipalities in zone 2, “The Brazilian Amazon with Forest Under Pressure”, retain large forest cover (>75% of their territory is still forest) but recently have been undergoing an accelerated process of deforestation. To define areas belonging to zone 5, “The Urban Brazilian Amazon”, we rely on the criteria used by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) on the location of urban centers and the population residing in these areas.

    The public policies recommendations for each of the zones are not mutually exclusive. Some of the proposals can be adopted in all zones, such as participation in the forest carbon market through the REDD+ mechanism (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) and the creation and consolidation of Protected Areas.

    In turn, forest restoration (planting of native trees) is more suitable in the deforested and forested under pressure zones. Improving agricultural productivity is a key action throughout the Brazilian Amazon, but it is a priority especially in the deforested zone.

    In the forest under pressure zone the priority must be to fight illegal land grabbing of public forests. Enforcement of laws against deforestation and forest degradation (predatory logging, forest fires, etc.), although necessary throughout the Brazilian Amazon, are more needed in the forest under pressure and in the deforested zones.

    Read the full paper here.